1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
6 Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare,
no food stamps, no health care, or other government
assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an
amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... options will be
restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property
are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
9. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations,
no waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing,
no bad-mouthing our president or his policies.
These will lead to deportation.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively
hunted &, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation
can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tancredo Letter to Mexican President Calderon
Found on Topix: dated Feb. 14, 2008

( WASHINGTON, D.C. ) – Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton) today sent a letter to Mexican President Felipe Calderon questioning the motives behind his current visit to the United States as well as the charges levied by Mr. Calderon against the fairness of American immigration policy.
A copy of the letter is below:

President Calderon:

I was disappointed by misguided comments you recently made regarding U.S.-Mexico relations and U.S. immigration laws. Purveying misinformation
and absurd allegations is hardly a positive step to building a constructive partnership.

According to the Associated Press you recently said, “You have two economies. One economy is intensive in capital, which is the American
economy. One economy is intensive in labor, which is the Mexican economy. We are two complementary economies, and that phenomenon is
impossible to stop.” Yes, both countries benefit by the 85% of Mexico’s manufacturing exports that come to the U.S., but people are not
commodities. While I appreciate your concern for our joint prosperity, the economic and social ills that plague your country cannot be
resolved by simply exporting your citizens to the United States.

It is undeniable that Mexico faces major challenges. Endemic corruption and the power of violent drug cartels still dominate everyday life
across Mexico. Beyond the headlines, Mexico has deep institutional maladies. Mexico’s absurdly antiquated Napoleonic-inquisition styled
legal system and the squandering of robust energy-industry opportunity by a poorly managed, state-run Pemex monopoly are just two examples
of the kind of self-inflicted wounds that hobble your troubled nation.

I understand that you are attempting to resolve some of these problems and applaud your leadership in trying to do so. But what would contribute
more to the long term stability of your economy and your country would be to focus more energy on addressing your domestic challenges and less
on lobbying the U.S. to provide amnesty for Mexicans who have illegally entered this country with the blessing of your government.
In doing so, you might be able to keep Mexico’s “best and brightest young men” in Mexico – where they can contribute more to Mexico’s
economy than remittance payments. Unfortunately, your recent comments indicate that Mexico will continue its policy of encouraging illegal
immigration and treating the United States as little more than a dumping ground for your social and economic problems.

In your speech yesterday to the California State legislature, you lectured the American people on how to improve our immigration policies.
Why did you not propose that we model our policies on Mexico’s own policies toward illegal entry across your own southern border? Mexico
expends enormous resources to prevent Guatemalans, Hondurans and Salvadorans from entering the country illegally, but you castigate the
United States for wanting secure borders. Mr. President, in my neighborhood that is called hypocrisy.

You proposed in your Sacramento speech that “migration” be made “legal, safe and organized.” Mr. President, we already have such a program
and it is called legal immigration. Over one million legal immigrants come through our ports of entry each year, not across our border
fences. The American people set limits on the number of legal immigrants through our immigration laws, and it is not the job of the Mexican
government to revise or expand those limits.

President Calderon, you are insulting the American people when you tell us that fifteen to twenty million illegal aliens in our country
bring only benefits and no costs. I challenge you to give one concrete example of how the enforcement of our existing immigration laws
violates anyone’s human rights. The people of Oklahoma are not anti-Mexican for passing laws to require verification of employment
eligibility. The people of Indiana are not anti-immigrant for passing laws to require photo identification for voting.
The people of California are not anti-Mexican for denying driver’s licenses to illegal aliens.
The people of Arizona are not anti-immigrant for passing laws that deny welfare benefits to people who are in that state unlawfully.

It is no secret that the purpose of your visit is to influence the American election, and in fact your trip has been billed as a high-stakes
effort to shape the immigration debate underway in the U.S. presidential race.
What is perhaps more disappointing, however, is your attempt to insinuate that anti-amnesty sentiment here in the U.S. is the same as
anti-Mexican sentiment. I am referring to your statement, “I need to change in the perception that the Americans are the enemy, and it
is important to change the perception that the Mexicans are the enemy.”

It is both disingenuous and dangerous for you to inject this kind of xenophobia into this debate. The fact that the overwhelming majority
of Americans support the enforcement of our immigration laws and take issue with the notion that we should reward illegal behavior,
hardly qualifies as ethnic animosity or international enmity. What you must understand is that a treasured aspect of our national foundation
is a respect for the rule of law. Perhaps if corruption were not so widespread and commonplace in Mexico, it would be easier for you to
understand this.

President Calderon, in many ways your trip thus far has been a long series of mixed messages. You accuse the United States of recent
protectionist trends, yet you heavily restrict foreign entry into Mexico’s energy sector through a massive, state-run Pemex monopoly.
You assure American politicians that an open flow of cheap Mexican labor is not only benign but vitally necessary, but you take great
care in securing your own southern border with Guatemala. You come to the United States purportedly to promote better political and economic
ties with the U.S., but then issue a thinly veiled threat that Mexicans will regard the U.S. as an enemy if we refuse to provide millions
of illegal aliens with unconditional amnesty.

President Calderon, I respectfully suggest that the next time you visit our country, rather than trying to influence U.S. policymakers or
our election process, you take time to listen to Americans rather than lecture them. If you want to make changes in government policies,
apply your energies to Mexico’s laundry list of problems rather than meddling in domestic American politics.

In Election 2008, don’t Forget The Angry White Man!

Gary Hubbell
February 9, 2008

There is a great amount of interest in this year’s presidential elections, as everybody
seems to recognize that our next president has to be a lot better than George Bush.
The Democrats are riding high with two groundbreaking candidates — a woman and
an African-American — while the conservative Republicans are in a quandary
about their party’s nod to a quasi-liberal maverick, John McCain.

Each candidate is carefully pandering to a smorgasbord of special-interest groups, ranging
from gay, lesbian and transgender people to children of illegal immigrants to working
mothers to evangelical Christians.

There is one group no one has recognized, and it is the group that will decide the election:
the Angry White Man. The Angry White Man comes from all economic backgrounds,
from dirt-poor to filthy rich. He represents all geographic areas in America, from urban
sophisticate to rural redneck, deep South to mountain West, left Coast to Eastern
Seaboard.

His common traits are that he isn’t looking for anything from anyone — just the promise
to be able to make his own way on a level playing field. In many cases, he is an
independent businessman and employs several people. He pays more than his share of
taxes and works hard.

The victimhood syndrome buzzwords — “disenfranchised,” “marginalized” and
“voiceless” — don’t resonate with him. “Press ‘one’ for English” is a curse-word to him.
He’s used to picking up the tab, whether it’s the company Christmas party, three sets of
braces, three college educations or a beautiful wedding.

He believes the Constitution is to be interpreted literally, not as a “living document” open
to the whims and vagaries of a panel of judges who have never worked an honest day in
their lives.

The Angry White Man owns firearms, and he’s willing to pick up a gun to defend his
home and his country. He is willing to lay down his life to defend the freedom and safety
of others, and the thought of killing someone who needs killing really doesn’t bother him.

The Angry White Man is not a metrosexual, a homosexual or a victim. Nobody like him
drowned in Hurricane Katrina — he got his people together and got the hell out, then went
back in to rescue those too helpless and stupid to help themselves, often as a police
officer, a National Guard soldier or a volunteer firefighter.

His last name and religion don’t matter. His background might be Italian, English, Polish,
German, Slavic, Irish, or Russian, and he might have Cherokee, Mexican, or Puerto Rican
mixed in, but he considers himself a white American.

He’s a man’s man, the kind of guy who likes to play poker, watch football, hunt white-
tailed deer, call turkeys, play golf, spend a few bucks at a strip club once in a blue moon,
change his own oil and build things. He coaches baseball, soccer and football teams and
doesn’t ask for a penny. He’s the kind of guy who can put an addition on his house with a
couple of friends, drill an oil well, weld a new bumper for his truck, design a factory and
publish books. He can fill a train with 100,000 tons of coal and get it to the power plant
on time so that you keep the lights on and never know what it took to flip that light
switch.

Women either love him or hate him, but they know he’s a man, not a dishrag. If they’re
looking for someone to walk all over, they’ve got the wrong guy. He stands up straight,
opens doors for women and says “Yes, sir” and “No, ma’am.”

He might be a Republican and he might be a Democrat; he might be a Libertarian or a
Green. He knows that his wife is more emotional than rational, and he guides the family
in a rational manner.

He’s not a racist, but he is annoyed and disappointed when people of certain backgrounds
exhibit behavior that typifies the worst stereotypes of their race. He’s willing to give
everybody a fair chance if they work hard, play by the rules and learn English.

Most important, the Angry White Man is pissed off. When his job site becomes flooded
with illegal workers who don’t pay taxes and his wages drop like a stone, he gets
righteously angry. When his job gets shipped overseas, and he has to speak to some
incomprehensible idiot in India for tech support, he simmers. When Al Sharpton comes
on TV, leading some rally for reparations for slavery or some such nonsense, he bites his
tongue and he remembers. When a child gets charged with carrying a concealed weapon
for mistakenly bringing a penknife to school, he takes note of who the local idiots
are in education and law enforcement.

He also votes, and the Angry White Man loathes Hillary Clinton. Her voice reminds him
of a shovel scraping a rock. He recoils at the mere sight of her on television. Her very
image disgusts him, and he cannot fathom why anyone would want her as their leader.
It’s not that she is a woman. It’s that she is who she is. It’s the liberal victim groups
she panders to, the “poor me” attitude that she represents, her inability to give a straight
answer to an honest question, his tax dollars that she wants to give to people who refuse
to do anything for themselves.

There are many millions of Angry White Men. Four million Angry White Men are
members of the National Rifle Association, and all of them will vote against Hillary,
Clinton, just as the great majority of them voted for George Bush.

He hopes that she will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, and he will
make sure that she gets beaten like a drum.

PLEASE WATCH!

This really brings home the scary future regarding immigration and economics.
It is purely statistical. California is the closest model.
This really puts the situation in persective.

This is a very good letter to the editor. NOT printed in the Orange County Paper....................Submitted by friends in California and Texas

Newspapers simply won't publish letters to the editor which they either deem politically incorrect (read below) or which does not agree with the philosophy they're pushing on the public. This woman wrote a great letter to the editor that should have been published; but, with your help it will get published via cyber space!

Written in response to a series of letters to the editor in the Orange County Register:

Dear Editor:

So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.
Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.
They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity. Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out.
My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany, Italy, France and Japan . None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the United States of America as one people. When we liberated France, no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
And here we are in 2006 with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life . I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty, it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet.

(signed) Rosemary L. (I deleted her last last name)

There was a Chemistry professor in a large college that had some exchange students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab the Prof noticed one young man (exchange student) who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt.

The professor asked the young man what was the matter. The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's government and install a new communist government.

In the midst of his story he looked at the professor and asked a strange question. He asked, “Do you know how to catch wild pigs?“ The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said this was no joke.

You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come everyday to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side.

By now the pigs, who are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat, you slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd. Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.

The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening to America. The government keeps pushing us toward Communism/Socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare, medicine, drugs, etc. while we continually lose our freedoms- just a little at a time.

One should always remember 'There is no such thing as a free Lunch!' Also, you can never hire someone to provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself. If you see that all of this wonderful government 'help' is a problem confronting the future of democracy in America, you might want to share this story with your friends. If you think the free ride is essential to your way of life then you will probably want to keep quiet, but God help us when the gate slams shut!

I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them.

1.$11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year.

2.$2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.

3.$2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

4.$12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!

5.$17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

6.$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.

7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.

8.$90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

9.$200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

10. The illegal aliens in the United Stateshave a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .

11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroine and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.

12. The National Policy Institute, "estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period."

13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin.

14. "The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States ."

The total cost is a whooping .$338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR! If this doesn't bother you then just don't share this message page, but on the other hand, if it does raise the hair on the back of your neck, then copy and forward it to every human in the country including every representative in Washington , DC four times a week for a month.

CONFIRMATION LINKS:

http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8

http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation

http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm

http://www.drdsk.com/

Cheap Labor . . . Cheap Tomatoes . .. . This should make everyone think, be you Democrat, Republican or Independent !

From a California school teacher - - -"As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:

I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic and income levels.

Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens , Huntington Park , etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.

Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I'm not talking a glass of milk and roll -- but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them "Putas" whores and throwing things that the teachers were in tears.

Free medical, free education, free food, day care etc., etc., etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?

To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.

Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc, etc. For me, I'll pay more for tomatoes.

We need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won't have the guts to enforce it. Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?

There are many hardworking Hispanic/American citizens that contribute to our country and many that I consider my true friends. We should encourage and accept those Hispanics who have done it the right and legal way.

It does, however, have everything to do with culture: A third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15 and that refuses to assimilate, and an American culture that has become so weak and worried about "politically correct" that we don't have the will to do anything about it.

If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know.

CHEAP LABOR?

Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about?

Business doesn't want to pay a decent wage.

Consumers don't want expensive produce.

Government will tell you Americans don't want the jobs.

But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase "cheap labor" is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as "cheap labor."

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or $6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an "earned income credit" of up to $3,200 free.

He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for food stamps.

He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.

His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.

He requires bilingual teachers and books.

He qualifies for relief from high energy bills.

If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI. Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer's expense.

He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.

Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his.

The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up.

Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT! Wake up people. THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR EITHER PARTY. AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON'T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM AT ONCE !

I grew up during the 1940's through the 1950's, having been born just before the start of WW II.

If you talk to a person from my era, those of us over 50 and 60 years old you will find that we are all like minded.

I am afraid however that the younger generations just don't seem to care. To me they seem apathetic about most issues, including politics and unfortunately illegal aliens flooding into our Nation. As long as they have their Ipods, their Plasma TV's and their BMW's they seem oblivious to what is going on in our Nation and in the World.

To them they are either unaware of what is going on outside their circle of comfort or it is somebody elses problem. They just don't know about it or don't care about it as long as it does not affect them personally.

I think in some ways it has to do with the environment in which they grew up. For instance in my case I grew up in the Hollywood area of Los Angeles. There were no (mod edit out) illegal students in my elementary school, junior high school or high school. They just did not live in our school district area. Remember I am talking about 1945 through 1957 when I graduated from high school.

We did not know what grafitti on buildings was nor did we have to walk by apartment buildings or commercial buildings on our way to school, surrounded by iron fences and razor wire. We used to shop at the Sears Store on Santa Monica Blvd. near Western. We never feared for our safety.

Sometime after this, probably in the 1980's things began to change. The high school I went to became predominantly (mod edit out)illegal. Buildings and Freeways started to be covered in grafitti. Iron fences and razor wire started going up around apartments and commercial buildings. The area around the Sears Store on Santa Monica and Western Avenues became more and more (mod edit out) illegal, where today I would guess the (mod edit out) illegal population in that area to be above 70 percent. Today that area has block after block after block of Spanish signs on stores, Spanish music blaring from loudspeakers in front of these stores and hundreds of Spanish speaking street merchants hawking their goods on the sidewalks. Every person you see is a Hispanic man, woman or family and if it is a woman she usually has a number of children with her as she pushes a baby buggy in front of her.

Now if you were born after this all started to happen, and neighborhoods across America started to mimic this area of Hollywood that I have described above, then you do not know anything else. You do not know an America that did not have (mod edit out)illegal ghettos or Barrios as they call them. You did not know an America without graffiti and iron fences and razor wire. You did not know an America that only had English Speaking Radio and Television Stations instead of the thousands of Spanish language stations we have today across America, from Miami to Seattle and from San Diego to New York.

Thus if you are a younger person, under the age of 40 the only America you probably know, from your cognitive years on, is the one I have described above. I like to call this generation the Ipod generation.

If you never knew an America without graffiti; if you never knew an America without iron fences and razor wire; if you never knew an America where every person working in a fast food restaurant or car wash was not (mod edit out) illegal; if you never knew an America where you could turn on the radio and TV and hear your own language and if you never knew an America where you did not have to press one for English and two for Spanish then you do not know what you have missed! It becomes impossible to care for or about something that you never knew in the first place.

For these reasons it is my personal belief that the younger generation of America, the Ipod generation, will not do what is necessary to save America and to prevent America from becoming a third world Spanish speaking nation. I hope that I am wrong. I hope that Americans for Legal Immigration, the Federation for Immigration Reform (F.A.I.R.) and all the other groups that I know are trying to Save America will check their membership demographics and prove me wrong. But so far my own personal experience indicates otherwise.

One last thing. I know that I will be attacked as a racist, a hater of Hispanics for what I said above. But the facts are as I said. There were no (mod edit out) illegals that I can remember in any of my schools or in my neighborhood. I didn't make it so. I did not cause this to be, but it was.

I have no hatred or animosity towards any group. I just want those that come to America to come here legally, learn and speak English, learn American History, want to become American citizens and obey the law. I want an America without grafitti, iron bars, razor wire, and having to press One for English and Two for Spanish.